Post Covid 19 E-Learning Strategy Based on Usability Maturity Model for Higher Learning Institutions, Kenya  
  Authors : Kelvin Omieno


Department of Information Technology and Informatics School of Computing and Information Technology Kaimosi Friends University College Kaimosi, Kenya


Published In : IJCAT Journal Volume 7, Issue 7

Date of Publication : July 2020

Pages : 115-122

Figures :08

Tables :02




Kelvin Kabeti Omieno : holds a PhD in Business Information Systems of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science & Technology (Kenya). He has MSc in Information Technology and Bachelor of Science in Computer Science (First Class Honors) from Masinde Muliro University of. Science and Technology (Kenya). Dr. Omieno is a Senior Lecturer at Kaimosi Friends University College, Kenya and has been involved in a number of research projects of ICTs for Development, Data Analytics, Computational Grid Project, Health Informatics, E-learning systems and E-waste management in Kenya.








e-learning approaches, eLearning Maturity Model (eMM), e-learning strategy, theory, model















The eMM model is a useful tool that provides detailed information on institutional capacity for eLearning delivery; therefore, it is of use to authorities and decision makers. Kenyan universities need to develop better strategy of e- learning beyond covid 19 era. The managers must know and be aware of the variety of ways in which the e-learning manifests itself in the institutions. Assessing e-learning maturity with eMM is an intensive and resource demanding process that benefits from the participation of people from different domains including strategic management, quality assurance, e-learning pedagogy, e-learning support and e-learning technology development Also, student involvement in the process is something to consider carefully in future re-assessments of maturity by higher learning institutions. Even though institutional culture would rather promote different kind of approaches to assessing and developing processes, introducing oneself with eMM can widen perspectives on the field.










[1] Wilson, G. (2001). The promise of online education: El Dorado or Fool's Gold? The Educational Technol-ogy Journal, 11 (1). [2] Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L. & Nunamaker, J. (2004). Can E-Learning Re-place Traditional Classroom Learning? - Evidence and Implication of the Evolving E-Learning Technology. Communications of the ACM. 47(5), pp.75-79. [3] HEFCE (2009), Enhancing learning and teaching through the use of technolo-gy: A revised approach to HEFCE's strategy for e-learning. [4] Marshall S and Mitchell G (2004), " Applying SPICE to e-learning: an e-learning maturity model," In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education- Volume 30 pp. 185-191. Australian Computer Society, Inc. 2004. [5] Haukijärvi, I. & Nevalainen, T. Developing a Quality Enhancement Framework for Collaborative Online Courses - Building on Constructivism with a Design Science in Information Systems Approach. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2014 (pp. 480-489). AACE, Chesapeake, VA (2014). [6] Tawsopar K and Mekhabunchakij K (2009). "Applying eMM in a 3D Approach to e-Learning Quality Improvement." Computer Engineering and Technology, 2009. ICCET'09. International Conference on. Vol. 1. IEEE, 2009. [7] Marshall, S. and Mitchell, G. (2002),"e-Learning: The e-Learning Maturity Model", Journal Of Distance Education, 24(1), 143-166. [8] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass; Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. [9] Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Academic Press, Inc. 179-211 [10] Banks S. PowellA. Developing institutional readiness for implementing networked learning Networked Learning Conference ProceedingsMarch26-282002 2002 4146 [Google Scholar] [11] Barr H. Interprofessional education today, yesterday and tomorrow: a review 2002 Learning and Teaching Support Network Centre for Health Sciences and Practice. Available online at: (accessed 23 January 2006) [Google Scholar] [12] Baume A. D.IT Term at Oxford Brookes University-an evaluation Internal report October1996 [Google Scholar] [13] Beaty E.Cousin G. Deepwell F. Introducing e-learning via a community network: a teaching and learning strategy in action Networked Learning Conference ProceedingsMarch26-282002 2002 3640 [Google Scholar] [14] Beetham H. Bailey P. Professional development for organizational change Academic and educational development: research, evaluation and changing practice in higher education Macdonald R. Wisdom J. Kogan PageLondon2002 164176 [Google Scholar] [15] Bell M. Bush D. Nicholson P.O' Brien D. TranT. Universities online: a survey of online education and services in Australia 2002 Commonwealth Department of Education Science and Training, Higher Education Group. Available online at: (accessed 27 May 2005) [Google Scholar] [16] Benfield A case study of an emerging community of practice: learning technologists embedded in academic schools (in preparation) [Google Scholar] [17] Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts, United States: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [18] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [19] Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30. [20] Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213-236. [21] Hevner et al. (2004). Design Science in IS Research. MIS Quarterly [22] Marshal, S. What are the key factors that lead to effective adoption and support of e-learning by institutions? HERDSA, Sydney, Australia (2008), from Hiver, A. R., & March, S. T, & Park, J., & Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 75-105 (2004). [23] Marshall, S. and Mitchell, G. (2002), "An e-learning maturity model?", Proceedings of ASCILITE 2002, Auckland, New Zealand. [24] Paulk M. C., Curtis B, Chrissis M. B. and Weber C. V., "Capability maturity model", version 1.1. IEEE soft,1993. [25] Parasuraman, A., & Colby L. C. (2001). Techno-Ready Marketing, The Free Press. [26] Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed., New York: The Free Press [27] Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1). [28] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., & Davis, G.B. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. [29] Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Science, 39 (2), 273-312